The global ban on commercial whaling has been in effect since 1986, yet three nations—Japan, Norway, and Iceland—continue to hunt whales under exceptions and objections to international agreements. Despite efforts to end this practice, loopholes and economic interests have allowed these countries to persist, threatening whale populations and global marine ecosystems.

The Ongoing Killings

The International Whaling Commission (IWC) imposed a moratorium on commercial whaling nearly 40 years ago to save several species from extinction. Yet, since the ban, more than 43,000 whales have been killed for commercial purposes by Japan, Norway, and Iceland, according to EIA International.

Japan, citing “scientific research,” hunted nearly 16,000 whales in Antarctica before withdrawing from the IWC in 2019. Norway, which formally objected to the ban, has killed over 15,000 whales since 1986, with its most recent season ending with 414 whales killed, reports Humane Society International. Iceland, meanwhile, has resumed fin whale hunting despite declining public support and mounting international criticism.

This continued killing defies international agreements, including the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), which bans trade in endangered whale products. These nations claim cultural and economic justifications, but demand for whale meat has plummeted. In Japan, annual whale meat consumption fell by 99% from its peak in 1962, HSI reports.

The Ecosystem Impact

Whales are essential to marine ecosystems. They regulate nutrient cycles through their movements and waste, contributing to the health of phytoplankton—the base of the ocean food web. Their presence supports fish stocks and helps combat climate change by sequestering carbon in their massive bodies. A single whale carcass can deliver nutrients to the seafloor for decades, creating habitats for deep-sea species, as reported by the Animal Welfare Institute.

Commercial whaling not only disrupts this ecological balance but also exacerbates the species’ vulnerability to other threats, such as climate change, ship collisions, and pollution. These cumulative pressures make the recovery of whale populations even more precarious.

Economic and Cultural Arguments

Pro-whaling advocates argue that hunting provides economic benefits and cultural preservation. Norway justifies its quotas as part of its fishing industry, though the market for whale meat has sharply declined. In Iceland, where fewer than 1% of citizens consume whale meat regularly, the industry has failed to turn a profit for years. Whaling companies in Iceland have even experimented with using unsold whale meat as feed for fur animals, an act criticized by conservation groups like EIA International.

Japan, too, has invested heavily in reviving its whaling fleet, recently launching a $47 million factory ship. Yet public opposition grows, with 85% of Japanese citizens opposing the use of taxpayer money for such initiatives, according to Common Dreams.

Conservation Alternatives

Efforts to shift from whaling to sustainable industries are gaining traction. Iceland has embraced whale watching, which generated more than 300,000 annual visitors in recent years, compared to just 30,000 in the late 1990s. This sector now brings significant revenue and employs locals without harming marine life, reports IFAW.

Similar successes are seen in Japan, where whale-watching tourism generates over $22 million annually. These examples highlight a growing global interest in eco-tourism, which benefits both economies and conservation efforts.

International Pushback

The IWC and environmental organizations continue to advocate for stronger enforcement of the moratorium. At a recent IWC meeting in Peru, member states rejected attempts by pro-whaling nations to lift the ban. Instead, the commission adopted a resolution proposed by the European Union to reinforce the moratorium, as reported by The Maritime Executive.

Global campaigns, including a celebrity-backed plea at the G20 summit, have urged Japan, Norway, and Iceland to abandon whaling. Steve Backshall, a naturalist and conservationist, told Humane Society International that whaling was “deeply at odds with the rest of the world.”

The Path Forward

Ending commercial whaling requires international cooperation and sustained advocacy. Strengthening eco-tourism, enforcing trade bans, and increasing public awareness are critical. For nations still engaged in whaling, the global community must make it clear that the practice is economically unviable and morally indefensible.

As whale populations face mounting threats, the call for an end to commercial whaling grows louder. It is a fight not just for these majestic creatures, but for the health of oceans and the planet.

Click below to take action for whales!